The HullaBoard  

Go Back   The HullaBoard > Other Stuff > Politics & Media
User Name
Password
Home Forum Gallery Arcade Journals FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 5th, 2002, 07:21 PM   #1
Keebler~Elf
Hullaboarder
 
Keebler~Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington D.C.
Send a message via ICQ to Keebler~Elf Send a message via AIM to Keebler~Elf
Talking VICTORY IN NEW ORLEANS!! *very important!*

Citing Free Speech Rights, LA Court Rejects
Government's Extremist Tactics in Culture War Against Raves


NEW ORLEANS--In a ruling the American Civil Liberties Union called a "major victory" for free speech rights, a federal judge today permanently blocked federal agents from banning masks, pacifiers, and glow sticks at a local dance venue as part of its nationwide war against rave concerts.

"Today's decision should send a message to government that the way to combat illegal substance abuse is not through intimidation and nonsensical laws," said Graham Boyd, Director of the ACLU's Drug Policy Litigation Project, which filed a challenge to the ban on behalf of rave enthusiasts and performers.

Raves are electronic music concerts that the government seeks to close because some attendees use the drug Ecstasy. But that approach, Boyd said, is tantamount to shutting down rock concerts in the 1960s or jazz clubs in the 1920s because some people are using drugs.

The court today agreed. In his ruling, U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous said that while there is a "legitimate government interest" in curtailing illegal drug use, "the government cannot ban inherently legal objects that are used in expressive communication because a few people use the same legal item to enhance the effects of an illegal substance."


Judge Porteous also noted that "there is no conclusive evidence that eliminating the banned items has reduced the amount of ecstasy use at raves." And in a particularly stern warning against the Attorney General’s drug war tactics, he concluded, "when the First Amendment right of Free Speech is violated by the Government in the name of the War on Drugs, and when that First Amendment violation is arguably not even helping in the War on Drugs, it is the duty of the Courts to enjointhe government from violating the rights of innocent people."

Joe Cook, Executive Director of the ACLU of Louisiana, welcomed the court’s unambiguous defense of free speech rights. "We the people should rejoice in this blow for our rights and not allow any of our freedoms to become a casualty in the war on drugs," he said.

The ACLU filed its challenge to the policy in August 2001, after the
Drug Enforcement Agency forced the owners of a prominent New Orleans dance venue to ban face masks, glow sticks and pacifiers from their facility, saying that the items constituted "drug paraphernalia." As a result of the ban, rave attendees were forced to throw away or have confiscated personal effects in order to gain entry into dance events given at the venue.

Boyd said that the government has been holding workshops around the country citing the New Orleans case as an example of how to shut down a rave. The government has also encouraged local prosecutors to charge rave promoters as drug dealers under state and federal "crack house" laws and to engage in excessive enforcement of parking permits and other local laws in order to disrupt the events.

"Today’s ruling tells law enforcement agents that if you want to target drug use at raves, you’ve got to play by the rules," Boyd said. "Go after the drug dealers, not the entertainers and dancers and people who are there to enjoy the show."

The ACLU brought its case against the government on behalf of local rave enthusiasts, including a former member of the armed forces and an insurance agent whose masks and glow sticks were confiscated at a rave last summer, and an internationally renowned performance group that faced cancellation of an act incorporating glow sticks.
An ACLU online feature on this case, including links to court papers, is available at:

http://www.aclu.org/issues/drugpoli...v_Ashcroft.html
Keebler~Elf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 5th, 2002, 07:28 PM   #2
anabolic frolic
Administrator
 
anabolic frolic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: HullaLand
Photos: 125  Users Photo Gallery
Journal Entries: 5 View Users Journal
Amazing news. There might just be some hope yet.
anabolic frolic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 5th, 2002, 09:08 PM   #3
Keebler~Elf
Hullaboarder
 
Keebler~Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington D.C.
Send a message via ICQ to Keebler~Elf Send a message via AIM to Keebler~Elf
Post

If you have some free time, and really want the meat of the case, go here:

http://www.aclu.org/court/behan_memorandum.pdf

and check out the actual brief. It's pretty amazing. A tidbit:
Quote:
The government’s goal was clear: eliminate raves at the State Palace. Failing to achieve this goal through the prosecution of Robert Brunet, Brian Brunet, and James Estopinal, it moved to end the rave phenomenon by suppressing the culture itself, striking a blow against this genre of music and dance. This notion of equating a form of music with a particular drug is not new. But the strategy of prosecuting the purveyors of music and attacking the cultural symbols associated with that genre sets a frightening precedent, one that would have given the government license to
eliminate jazz, rock, punk, and many other kinds of music in years past. Allowing this attack on electronic music concerts would lead an entire genre of music to go unheard.

Keebs

Last edited by Keebler~Elf : February 5th, 2002 at 09:14 PM.
Keebler~Elf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 5th, 2002, 09:50 PM   #4
funshine
Hullaboarder
 
funshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hisih Chih City, Taiwan
Send a message via ICQ to funshine Send a message via AIM to funshine
Thats great to hear
funshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6th, 2002, 01:09 AM   #5
Everybodies_Daddy
Hullaboarder
 
Everybodies_Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The Bordello
Photos: 8  Users Photo Gallery
Journal Entries: 25 View Users Journal
Send a message via ICQ to Everybodies_Daddy
All sorts of people on the field during the superbowl halftime show had glowsticks. They must have all been drugged up ravers.

MCED
__________________
Dirty Little Secrets

Hot + Dirty
Everybodies_Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6th, 2002, 08:42 AM   #6
imlookingthroughyourwindo
Hullaboarder
 
imlookingthroughyourwindo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, ontario
Send a message via ICQ to imlookingthroughyourwindo Send a message via AIM to imlookingthroughyourwindo
hey thats really awesome i glad you brought this to my attention keebler!
__________________
forever in the semi-conscious
imlookingthroughyourwindo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.